THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KIRANBHAI VITTHALBHAI KHANT Advocate - P K DESAI — 868/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060011112025
Filing Number
868/2025
Filing Date
26-09-2025
Registration No
868/2025
Registration Date
26-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50637
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KIRANBHAI VITTHALBHAI KHANT Advocate - P K DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 868/2025 The State of Gujarat vs. Kiranbhai Vitthalbhai Khant The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges, finding that the panchas (witnesses) who were mandatory during the search did not corroborate the prosecution's case. The court held that without independent witness testimony supporting the seizure and without proper compliance with procedural requirements for sample collection under the Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012, conviction could not be sustained solely on uncorroborated police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 868/2025 The State of Gujarat vs. Kiranbhai Vitthalbhai Khant The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges, finding that the panchas (witnesses) who were mandatory during the search did not corroborate the prosecution's case. The court held that without independent witness testimony supporting the seizure and without proper compliance with procedural requirements for sample collection under the Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012, conviction could not be sustained solely on uncorroborated police testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts