THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KISHANBHAI KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - V I BHARVAD — 867/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060011102025
Filing Number
867/2025
Filing Date
26-09-2025
Registration No
867/2025
Registration Date
26-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50538
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KISHANBHAI KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - V I BHARVAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 867/2025 Summary The State of Gujarat v. Kishanbhai Kantibhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges, finding that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof. Although police recovered one liter of country-made liquor (valued ₹400) from the accused's residence, the court determined that the panchas (mandatory witnesses) who were present during the search did not corroborate the prosecution's case, and critical procedural safeguards under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and forensic rules were not followed, including proper sample collection and testing protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 867/2025 Summary The State of Gujarat v. Kishanbhai Kantibhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges, finding that the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof. Although police recovered one liter of country-made liquor (valued ₹400) from the accused's residence, the court determined that the panchas (mandatory witnesses) who were present during the search did not corroborate the prosecution's case, and critical procedural safeguards under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and forensic rules were not followed, including proper sample collection and testing protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts