THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANGABHAI BALABHAI TARAR Advocate - H M THAKOR — 655/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060008542025

Filing Number

655/2025

Filing Date

30-Jul-2025

Registration No

655/2025

Registration Date

30-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50294

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGABHAI BALABHAI TARAR Advocate - H M THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case 655/2025 Summary The court acquitted Mangabhai Balabhai Tarar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (witnesses) who were allegedly present during the seizure did not corroborate the prosecution's claims; FSL reports on the seized liquor sample were absent; and the seizure lacked proper independent witness testimony, relying solely on uncorroborated police evidence. The court applied established precedent holding that when panchas are legally mandated, their corroborating testimony is essential for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 31-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 30-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 655/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 655/2025 Summary The court acquitted Mangabhai Balabhai Tarar of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (witnesses) who were allegedly present during the seizure did not corroborate the prosecution's claims; FSL reports on the seized liquor sample were absent; and the seizure lacked proper independent witness testimony, relying solely on uncorroborated police evidence. The court applied established precedent holding that when panchas are legally mandated, their corroborating testimony is essential for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case