THE STATE OF GUAJRAT vs NARESHBHAI KESHABHAI KHANT Advocate - I I MANSURI — 283/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060002912023

Filing Number

283/2023

Filing Date

31-Jan-2023

Registration No

283/2023

Registration Date

31-Jan-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20272

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUAJRAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARESHBHAI KESHABHAI KHANT Advocate - I I MANSURI

  2. 2.BHAVESHBHAI LALABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. I I MANSURI

  3. 3.VISHALBHAI JITUBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. I I MANSURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 283/2023 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Dhanusura, Gujarat Parties: State of Gujarat v. Nareshbhai Keshabhai Khant and Others (3 accused) Key Decision: The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Facts: The case involved a brawl allegedly occurring on 05-06-2022 where the complainant and witnesses claimed the accused had assaulted them using weapons and sticks while blocking their path, making threats, and collectively attacking them. Medical evidence showed minimal injuries inconsistent with the serious allegations. Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies: witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credibility; medical evidence didn't corroborate grievous injuries; accused's identification was questionable; and no clear circumstantial evidence established their guilt. The court held that merely suspecting guilt is insufficient—guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt with reliable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 22-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 30-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 26-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 11-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 17-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 24-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 24-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 31-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 283/2023 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Dhanusura, Gujarat Parties: State of Gujarat v. Nareshbhai Keshabhai Khant and Others (3 accused) Key Decision: The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Facts: The case involved a brawl allegedly occurring on 05-06-2022 where the complainant and witnesses claimed the accused had assaulted them using weapons and sticks while blocking their path, making threats, and collectively attacking them. Medical evidence showed minimal injuries inconsistent with the serious allegations. Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies: witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credibility; medical evidence didn't corroborate grievous injuries; accused's identification was questionable; and no clear circumstantial evidence established their guilt. The court held that merely suspecting guilt is insufficient—guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt with reliable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case