THE STATE OF GUAJRAT vs NARESHBHAI KESHABHAI KHANT Advocate - I I MANSURI — 283/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060002912023
Filing Number
283/2023
Filing Date
31-Jan-2023
Registration No
283/2023
Registration Date
31-Jan-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
20272
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUAJRAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARESHBHAI KESHABHAI KHANT Advocate - I I MANSURI
-
2.BHAVESHBHAI LALABHAI PARMAR
Adv. I I MANSURI
-
3.VISHALBHAI JITUBHAI PARMAR
Adv. I I MANSURI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 283/2023 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Dhanusura, Gujarat Parties: State of Gujarat v. Nareshbhai Keshabhai Khant and Others (3 accused) Key Decision: The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Facts: The case involved a brawl allegedly occurring on 05-06-2022 where the complainant and witnesses claimed the accused had assaulted them using weapons and sticks while blocking their path, making threats, and collectively attacking them. Medical evidence showed minimal injuries inconsistent with the serious allegations. Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies: witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credibility; medical evidence didn't corroborate grievous injuries; accused's identification was questionable; and no clear circumstantial evidence established their guilt. The court held that merely suspecting guilt is insufficient—guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt with reliable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 283/2023
Case Summary: 283/2023 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Dhanusura, Gujarat Parties: State of Gujarat v. Nareshbhai Keshabhai Khant and Others (3 accused) Key Decision: The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504, 506(2), 114 and Gujarat Police Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Facts: The case involved a brawl allegedly occurring on 05-06-2022 where the complainant and witnesses claimed the accused had assaulted them using weapons and sticks while blocking their path, making threats, and collectively attacking them. Medical evidence showed minimal injuries inconsistent with the serious allegations. Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies: witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked credibility; medical evidence didn't corroborate grievous injuries; accused's identification was questionable; and no clear circumstantial evidence established their guilt. The court held that merely suspecting guilt is insufficient—guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt with reliable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts