THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHIKHABHAI CHHAGANBHAI TARAR Advocate - P K DESAI — 153/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060001922026
Filing Number
153/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
153/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
60078
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHIKHABHAI CHHAGANBHAI TARAR Advocate - P K DESAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC 153/2026 The State of Gujarat challenged an acquittal in a liquor prohibition case against accused Bhikhabhai Chhaganbhai Tarar. The court found the prosecution's case fundamentally flawed due to lack of proper corroboration from independent witnesses (panchas) required during the search and seizure operation. The court noted critical deficiencies: no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on the seized liquor sample, failure to follow proper sample collection procedures under Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012, and police witnesses presenting evidence without independent witness corroboration. The court upheld the acquittal and rejected the State's appeal, holding that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when mandatory witness presence is statutorily required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 153/2026
Case Summary: CC 153/2026 The State of Gujarat challenged an acquittal in a liquor prohibition case against accused Bhikhabhai Chhaganbhai Tarar. The court found the prosecution's case fundamentally flawed due to lack of proper corroboration from independent witnesses (panchas) required during the search and seizure operation. The court noted critical deficiencies: no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on the seized liquor sample, failure to follow proper sample collection procedures under Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012, and police witnesses presenting evidence without independent witness corroboration. The court upheld the acquittal and rejected the State's appeal, holding that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when mandatory witness presence is statutorily required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts