PRAMUKH INFRATECH PPT LLT PROPRIETOR PRATIK PATEL vs DHARMI ROADLINES PROPRIETOR JITENDRAKUMAR MOGHABHAI PARMAR — 11/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJAR060001902026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAMUKH INFRATECH PPT LLT PROPRIETOR PRATIK PATEL
Adv. P K BHARVAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHARMI ROADLINES PROPRIETOR JITENDRAKUMAR MOGHABHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court directed that the accused must be summoned under Section 223 of the IPC before proceeding further, following the precedent established in Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar [2025(SC)952]. The court ordered the case to be remanded for proper summoning of the accused and directed the interim injunction to remain in force pending further proceedings scheduled for 18/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
The court directed that the accused must be summoned under Section 223 of the IPC before proceeding further, following the precedent established in Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar [2025(SC)952]. The court ordered the case to be remanded for proper summoning of the accused and directed the interim injunction to remain in force pending further proceedings scheduled for 18/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts