THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHATURJI RAMAJI PARMAR Advocate - N K BHARVAD — 33/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060000392026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50606
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHATURJI RAMAJI PARMAR Advocate - N K BHARVAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 33/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Chaturji Ramaji Parmar The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while police claimed to have seized 2 liters of country liquor from the accused's home on May 9, 2025, the testimonies of the mandatory panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's version, and critical procedural requirements—including proper sample collection and forensic analysis—were not followed according to the 2012 Rules. The judgment emphasized that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when pancha corroboration is legally mandatory; absent independent witness support and proper documentation, the entire investigation appeared compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 33/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Chaturji Ramaji Parmar The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while police claimed to have seized 2 liters of country liquor from the accused's home on May 9, 2025, the testimonies of the mandatory panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the prosecution's version, and critical procedural requirements—including proper sample collection and forensic analysis—were not followed according to the 2012 Rules. The judgment emphasized that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when pancha corroboration is legally mandatory; absent independent witness support and proper documentation, the entire investigation appeared compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts