THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAHESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI — 29/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060000352026

Filing Number

29/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50767

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P K DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 29/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Maheshbhai Kalabhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act after finding that the panchas (mandatory witnesses) who were present during the liquor seizure failed to corroborate the prosecution's case, and critical procedural requirements under the 2012 Liquor Sample Rules were not followed. The court held that without independent corroboration from the panchas and proper forensic analysis documentation, conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony, thereby setting aside the charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 29/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Maheshbhai Kalabhai Parmar The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act after finding that the panchas (mandatory witnesses) who were present during the liquor seizure failed to corroborate the prosecution's case, and critical procedural requirements under the 2012 Liquor Sample Rules were not followed. The court held that without independent corroboration from the panchas and proper forensic analysis documentation, conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony, thereby setting aside the charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case