THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HIMATSINH KODARSINH RATHOD Advocate - N K BHARVAD — 26/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060000322026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50848

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIMATSINH KODARSINH RATHOD Advocate - N K BHARVAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: State of Gujarat v. Himatsinh Kodarsinh Rathod (CC 26/2026) The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case without credible corroboration. Although liquor was allegedly recovered from the accused's residence, the court noted that the independent witnesses (panchas) who were required to be present during the search did not support the prosecution's version, and the evidence lacked proper documentary and forensic corroboration as mandated by Gujarat Prohibition Rules, 2012. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Gujarat v. Himatsinh Kodarsinh Rathod (CC 26/2026) The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor possession charges, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case without credible corroboration. Although liquor was allegedly recovered from the accused's residence, the court noted that the independent witnesses (panchas) who were required to be present during the search did not support the prosecution's version, and the evidence lacked proper documentary and forensic corroboration as mandated by Gujarat Prohibition Rules, 2012. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case