THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHANABHAI DAHYABHAI PARMAR Advocate - V I BHARVAD — 24/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060000302026
Filing Number
24/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
50579
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANABHAI DAHYABHAI PARMAR Advocate - V I BHARVAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 24/2026 The court acquitted the accused Shanabhai Dahyabhai Parmar in an illegal liquor possession case, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the panchas (witnesses) who were required to be present during the seizure did not corroborate the police's version, and critical procedural requirements under the Gujarat Prohibition Act were not followed, making the evidence unreliable. The accused was directed to be released on bail pending appeal, and any seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2026
Summary of Case 24/2026 The court acquitted the accused Shanabhai Dahyabhai Parmar in an illegal liquor possession case, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the panchas (witnesses) who were required to be present during the seizure did not corroborate the police's version, and critical procedural requirements under the Gujarat Prohibition Act were not followed, making the evidence unreliable. The accused was directed to be released on bail pending appeal, and any seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts