THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAGINBHAI KANTIBHAI VAGHARI Advocate - P K DESAI — 8/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR060000092026

Case disposed

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

02-01-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

02-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

50487

Police Station

DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(F)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NAGINBHAI KANTIBHAI VAGHARI Advocate - P K DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

22-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC No. 8/2026 Court Decision: The Gujarat High Court (First Class) acquitted Naginbhai Kantibhai Vaghari of illicit liquor possession charges, finding the prosecution's case insufficient due to lack of corroborating witness testimony and procedural irregularities in evidence collection. Key Reasoning: The court held that while police claimed to have seized 12 liters of country liquor from the accused's residence, the independent witnesses (panchas) who were mandatorily required to be present during the search failed to corroborate the prosecution's account. The court applied established precedent requiring that in cases involving obligatory witness presence, police evidence must be independently corroborated—reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony is insufficient for conviction. Additionally, the court found gaps in the sample collection and forensic analysis procedures prescribed under the 2012 Gujarat Prohibition Rules, further weakening the prosecution's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 8/2026 Court Decision: The Gujarat High Court (First Class) acquitted Naginbhai Kantibhai Vaghari of illicit liquor possession charges, finding the prosecution's case insufficient due to lack of corroborating witness testimony and procedural irregularities in evidence collection. Key Reasoning: The court held that while police claimed to have seized 12 liters of country liquor from the accused's residence, the independent witnesses (panchas) who were mandatorily required to be present during the search failed to corroborate the prosecution's account. The court applied established precedent requiring that in cases involving obligatory witness presence, police evidence must be independently corroborated—reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony is insufficient for conviction. Additionally, the court found gaps in the sample collection and forensic analysis procedures prescribed under the 2012 Gujarat Prohibition Rules, further weakening the prosecution's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case