THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAGINBHAI KANTIBHAI VAGHARI Advocate - P K DESAI — 8/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR060000092026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
02-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
02-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANSURA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
50487
Police Station
DHANSURA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NAGINBHAI KANTIBHAI VAGHARI Advocate - P K DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 8/2026 Court Decision: The Gujarat High Court (First Class) acquitted Naginbhai Kantibhai Vaghari of illicit liquor possession charges, finding the prosecution's case insufficient due to lack of corroborating witness testimony and procedural irregularities in evidence collection. Key Reasoning: The court held that while police claimed to have seized 12 liters of country liquor from the accused's residence, the independent witnesses (panchas) who were mandatorily required to be present during the search failed to corroborate the prosecution's account. The court applied established precedent requiring that in cases involving obligatory witness presence, police evidence must be independently corroborated—reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony is insufficient for conviction. Additionally, the court found gaps in the sample collection and forensic analysis procedures prescribed under the 2012 Gujarat Prohibition Rules, further weakening the prosecution's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 8/2026 Court Decision: The Gujarat High Court (First Class) acquitted Naginbhai Kantibhai Vaghari of illicit liquor possession charges, finding the prosecution's case insufficient due to lack of corroborating witness testimony and procedural irregularities in evidence collection. Key Reasoning: The court held that while police claimed to have seized 12 liters of country liquor from the accused's residence, the independent witnesses (panchas) who were mandatorily required to be present during the search failed to corroborate the prosecution's account. The court applied established precedent requiring that in cases involving obligatory witness presence, police evidence must be independently corroborated—reliance solely on uncorroborated police testimony is insufficient for conviction. Additionally, the court found gaps in the sample collection and forensic analysis procedures prescribed under the 2012 Gujarat Prohibition Rules, further weakening the prosecution's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts