THE MALPUR NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD.SHREE VISHANGKUMAR HASMUKHLAL MAHETA vs HARDIKKUMAR VASANTKUMAR MAHETA — 998/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050012062025
Filing Number
998/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
998/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MALPUR NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD.SHREE VISHANGKUMAR HASMUKHLAL MAHETA
Adv. N R VAGHELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARDIKKUMAR VASANTKUMAR MAHETA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Order
The Malpur Lok Adalat (dated 22-04-2026) ordered that case fees be imposed against the respondent Hardikkumar Vasantkumar Maheta based on video evidence presented during the Regular Lok Adalat proceedings under Section 6. The court directed the respondent to pay the case fees as per the judgment's basis on the video evidence submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 998/2025
The Malpur Lok Adalat (dated 22-04-2026) ordered that case fees be imposed against the respondent Hardikkumar Vasantkumar Maheta based on video evidence presented during the Regular Lok Adalat proceedings under Section 6. The court directed the respondent to pay the case fees as per the judgment's basis on the video evidence submitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts