KINJALBEN RANJITBHAI PAGI vs MAHETA VASANTKUMAR NAVNITLAL Advocate - S M AMIN — 870/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050010552025
Filing Number
870/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
870/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KINJALBEN RANJITBHAI PAGI
Adv. S K PANDYA
Respondent(s)
MAHETA VASANTKUMAR NAVNITLAL Advocate - S M AMIN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
| 12-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
| 10-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The National Lok Adalat at Malpur dismissed the criminal case against the respondent (Maheta Vasantkumar Navnitlal), finding him not guilty based on video evidence presented during proceedings under Section 15. The court ordered acquittal and directed that case fees be recovered based on the video evidence presented by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The National Lok Adalat at Malpur dismissed the criminal case against the respondent (Maheta Vasantkumar Navnitlal), finding him not guilty based on video evidence presented during proceedings under Section 15. The court ordered acquittal and directed that case fees be recovered based on the video evidence presented by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts