PATEL JIGARBHAI DHIRUBHAI, AMBIKA FINANCE PROPRIETOR vs CHHAYABEN HIMMATSINH SOLANKI Advocate - S K PANDYA — 788/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050009652025
Filing Number
788/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
788/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL JIGARBHAI DHIRUBHAI, AMBIKA FINANCE PROPRIETOR
Adv. K B BHARWAD
Respondent(s)
CHHAYABEN HIMMATSINH SOLANKI Advocate - S K PANDYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The National Lok Adalat at Malpur dismissed the respondent's objection and allowed the petitioner's case based on video evidence (Annex-18) presented during proceedings. The court ordered the respondent to bear the case costs and directed execution of the decree in accordance with the petitioner's video evidence submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The National Lok Adalat at Malpur dismissed the respondent's objection and allowed the petitioner's case based on video evidence (Annex-18) presented during proceedings. The court ordered the respondent to bear the case costs and directed execution of the decree in accordance with the petitioner's video evidence submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts