BHARWAD GOPALBHAI MITHABHAI vs BAMNIYA ISHAVARBHAI RATNABHAI Advocate - J G CHAUHAN — 740/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050008982025
Filing Number
740/2025
Filing Date
20-Sep-2025
Registration No
740/2025
Registration Date
20-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARWAD GOPALBHAI MITHABHAI
Adv. K B BHARWAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.BAMNIYA ISHAVARBHAI RATNABHAI Advocate - J G CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The National Lok Adalat court at Malpur dismissed the accused's acquittal plea and ordered proceedings to continue under Section 20 of the relevant statute, finding sufficient evidence in the FIR to proceed with the case. Court costs were imposed on the accused based on the merit of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 740/2025
The National Lok Adalat court at Malpur dismissed the accused's acquittal plea and ordered proceedings to continue under Section 20 of the relevant statute, finding sufficient evidence in the FIR to proceed with the case. Court costs were imposed on the accused based on the merit of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts