BHARWAD GOPALBHAI MITHABHAI vs BAMNIYA ISHAVARBHAI RATNABHAI Advocate - J G CHAUHAN — 740/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050008982025
Filing Number
740/2025
Filing Date
20-09-2025
Registration No
740/2025
Registration Date
20-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARWAD GOPALBHAI MITHABHAI
Adv. K B BHARWAD
Respondent(s)
BAMNIYA ISHAVARBHAI RATNABHAI Advocate - J G CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
| 12-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
| 23-02-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The National Lok Adalat court at Malpur dismissed the accused's acquittal plea and ordered proceedings to continue under Section 20 of the relevant statute, finding sufficient evidence in the FIR to proceed with the case. Court costs were imposed on the accused based on the merit of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The National Lok Adalat court at Malpur dismissed the accused's acquittal plea and ordered proceedings to continue under Section 20 of the relevant statute, finding sufficient evidence in the FIR to proceed with the case. Court costs were imposed on the accused based on the merit of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts