DAHYABHAI KODARBHAI SOLANKI vs USHABEN MANABHAI SUTARIYA Advocate - J S PATEL — 583/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050007062024
Filing Number
583/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
583/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DAHYABHAI KODARBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D V RAJAN
Respondent(s)
USHABEN MANABHAI SUTARIYA Advocate - J S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 583/2024 The National Lok Adalat at Malpur (Judge Pooja Surana) decided that the accused's acquittal order be set aside based on video evidence from Exhibit 47, and ordered the case to proceed on merits with appropriate court fees imposed on the petitioner, in accordance with the video evidence standards established in the lower court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 583/2024 The National Lok Adalat at Malpur (Judge Pooja Surana) decided that the accused's acquittal order be set aside based on video evidence from Exhibit 47, and ordered the case to proceed on merits with appropriate court fees imposed on the petitioner, in accordance with the video evidence standards established in the lower court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts