PATEL HEMANTBHAI MANHARBHAI vs KHANT GANPATBHAI GEMAJI Advocate - S M AMIN — 523/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050006322025
Filing Number
523/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
523/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL HEMANTBHAI MANHARBHAI
Adv. K B BHARWAD
Respondent(s)
KHANT GANPATBHAI GEMAJI Advocate - S M AMIN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 12-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 09-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 523/2025 Summary The National Lok Adalat (Malpur) decided that the respondent's plea to dismiss the case based on Video Prosecution Section 18 is rejected. The court ordered the respondent to pay court fees for the civil suit as per the Video Prosecution procedure and upheld the petitioner's right to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 523/2025 Summary The National Lok Adalat (Malpur) decided that the respondent's plea to dismiss the case based on Video Prosecution Section 18 is rejected. The court ordered the respondent to pay court fees for the civil suit as per the Video Prosecution procedure and upheld the petitioner's right to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts