THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RUDHRAX JAYESHKUMAR JAYSVAL Advocate - K B BHARWAD — 228/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050002762026
Filing Number
228/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
228/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11188006260019
Police Station
MALPUR POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RUDHRAX JAYESHKUMAR JAYSVAL Advocate - K B BHARWAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court held that the accused cannot be discharged under IPC Section 223(b) when charges involve student misconduct, as such offenses require cognizance by competent public officers or administrators. The court ruled that where multiple charges arise from a single transaction and at least one charge is not barred by Section 215, all charges must proceed together and cannot be separated; accordingly, the accused's discharge petition was rejected and the case was remitted for trial under IPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court held that the accused cannot be discharged under IPC Section 223(b) when charges involve student misconduct, as such offenses require cognizance by competent public officers or administrators. The court ruled that where multiple charges arise from a single transaction and at least one charge is not barred by Section 215, all charges must proceed together and cannot be separated; accordingly, the accused's discharge petition was rejected and the case was remitted for trial under IPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts