THE PIPRANA GROUP SEVA SAHKARI LTD. RATHOD HARENDRASINH NARVATSINH, vs KESHABHAI BHAGABHAI PAGI V Advocate - A N VAGHELA — 45/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR050000542025
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
23-01-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
23-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MALPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE PIPRANA GROUP SEVA SAHKARI LTD. RATHOD HARENDRASINH NARVATSINH,
Adv. R N PATEL
Respondent(s)
KESHABHAI BHAGABHAI PAGI V Advocate - A N VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 07-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The National Lok Adalat at Malpur dismissed the accused's plea for acquittal based on video evidence (Exhibit 30) presented by the petitioner, finding the case merits further proceedings. The court ordered that costs be awarded against the accused and directed the case to proceed to trial based on the admissible evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The National Lok Adalat at Malpur dismissed the accused's plea for acquittal based on video evidence (Exhibit 30) presented by the petitioner, finding the case merits further proceedings. The court ordered that costs be awarded against the accused and directed the case to proceed to trial based on the admissible evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts