GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BHURABHAI ARAVINDBHAI DAMOR Advocate - K K PATEL — 1038/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040014162024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1038/2024

Filing Date

17-10-2024

Registration No

1038/2024

Registration Date

17-10-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

201

Police Station

ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,504,506(2),

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BHURABHAI ARAVINDBHAI DAMOR Advocate - K K PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

28-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

19-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT
28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bhurabhaii Arvindabhaii Damor, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2) due to insufficient evidence. The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had committed the alleged offenses of voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and threatening language. The court found the complainant's testimony contradictory and unsupported by corroborating evidence, resulting in the accused being discharged under Criminal Procedure Code Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bhurabhaii Arvindabhaii Damor, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2) due to insufficient evidence. The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had committed the alleged offenses of voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and threatening language. The court found the complainant's testimony contradictory and unsupported by corroborating evidence, resulting in the accused being discharged under Criminal Procedure Code Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case