GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DALPATBHAI SAJJANSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - R.N.PATEL — 1272/2021
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR040013632021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1272/2021
Filing Date
25-08-2021
Registration No
1272/2021
Registration Date
25-08-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11188007210317
Police Station
MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DALPATBHAI SAJJANSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - R.N.PATEL
PRUTHVIPALSINH INDRASINH CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Dalpat Singh and Prithvipal Singh) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and IPC sections 65(A)(A), 116(B), 98(2), and 81, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the seized foreign whisky bottles came from the accused's possession, as critical procedural requirements—including proper panchayat (witness) signatures on seizure documents and authentication of seized goods—were not adequately established on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Dalpat Singh and Prithvipal Singh) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and IPC sections 65(A)(A), 116(B), 98(2), and 81, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the seized foreign whisky bottles came from the accused's possession, as critical procedural requirements—including proper panchayat (witness) signatures on seizure documents and authentication of seized goods—were not adequately established on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts