GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DALPATBHAI SAJJANSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - R.N.PATEL — 1272/2021
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR040013632021
Filing Number
1272/2021
Filing Date
25-Aug-2021
Registration No
1272/2021
Registration Date
25-Aug-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11188007210317
Police Station
MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DALPATBHAI SAJJANSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - R.N.PATEL
-
2.PRUTHVIPALSINH INDRASINH CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Dalpat Singh and Prithvipal Singh) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and IPC sections 65(A)(A), 116(B), 98(2), and 81, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the seized foreign whisky bottles came from the accused's possession, as critical procedural requirements—including proper panchayat (witness) signatures on seizure documents and authentication of seized goods—were not adequately established on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jun-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 1272/2021
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Dalpat Singh and Prithvipal Singh) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and IPC sections 65(A)(A), 116(B), 98(2), and 81, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the seized foreign whisky bottles came from the accused's possession, as critical procedural requirements—including proper panchayat (witness) signatures on seizure documents and authentication of seized goods—were not adequately established on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts