GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI @ BACHABHAI VAGHABHAI DAMOR Advocate - R N PATEL — 977/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354A,D,506(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040011142022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

977/2022

Filing Date

05-09-2022

Registration No

977/2022

Registration Date

05-09-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

0065

Police Station

MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 354A,D,506(2),

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SURESHBHAI @ BACHABHAI VAGHABHAI DAMOR Advocate - R N PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

17-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC.NO.977/2022 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meghraj, acquitted the accused Sureshbhai (alias Bachabhai) Vaghabhai Damor under IPC Sections 354(a)(i) and 506(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court analyzed the complainant's testimony (Exhibit 19) and other evidence, concluding that while a common altercation occurred between the parties, there was insufficient documentary or medical evidence to substantiate allegations of sexual harassment or death threats. The complainant's own testimony contradicted the charge sheet, and no corroborating evidence supported the serious accusations made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.NO.977/2022 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meghraj, acquitted the accused Sureshbhai (alias Bachabhai) Vaghabhai Damor under IPC Sections 354(a)(i) and 506(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court analyzed the complainant's testimony (Exhibit 19) and other evidence, concluding that while a common altercation occurred between the parties, there was insufficient documentary or medical evidence to substantiate allegations of sexual harassment or death threats. The complainant's own testimony contradicted the charge sheet, and no corroborating evidence supported the serious accusations made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case