GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NARENDRAKUMAR @ RATANLAL HAKRABHAI FANAT Advocate - B K RATHOD — 911/2023

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,81. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040009502023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

911/2023

Filing Date

04-03-2023

Registration No

911/2023

Registration Date

04-03-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188005220233

Police Station

ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AE,81

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NARENDRAKUMAR @ RATANLAL HAKRABHAI FANAT Advocate - B K RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

01-04-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

19-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted Narendrakumar Ratnalal Hakrabhai Fanat of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A.I.), 81, due to insufficient evidence. While police recovered sealed alcohol bottles and a motorcycle from the accused, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case, particularly regarding witness credibility and lack of independent corroboration of the contraband's sealed condition and company authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted Narendrakumar Ratnalal Hakrabhai Fanat of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A.I.), 81, due to insufficient evidence. While police recovered sealed alcohol bottles and a motorcycle from the accused, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case, particularly regarding witness credibility and lack of independent corroboration of the contraband's sealed condition and company authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case