GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NARENDRAKUMAR @ RATANLAL HAKRABHAI FANAT Advocate - B K RATHOD — 911/2023

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,81. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040009502023

Filing Number

911/2023

Filing Date

04-Mar-2023

Registration No

911/2023

Registration Date

04-Mar-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188005220233

Police Station

ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRAKUMAR @ RATANLAL HAKRABHAI FANAT Advocate - B K RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted Narendrakumar Ratnalal Hakrabhai Fanat of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A.I.), 81, due to insufficient evidence. While police recovered sealed alcohol bottles and a motorcycle from the accused, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case, particularly regarding witness credibility and lack of independent corroboration of the contraband's sealed condition and company authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 05-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 04-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 14-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 31-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 24-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 01-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 29-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 26-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 04-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 04-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 911/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted Narendrakumar Ratnalal Hakrabhai Fanat of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A.I.), 81, due to insufficient evidence. While police recovered sealed alcohol bottles and a motorcycle from the accused, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case, particularly regarding witness credibility and lack of independent corroboration of the contraband's sealed condition and company authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case