GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MOTILAL BADAJI KOTAD — 694/2023

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040007162023

Filing Number

694/2023

Filing Date

07-Feb-2023

Registration No

694/2023

Registration Date

07-Feb-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188007210475

Police Station

MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B,81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOTILAL BADAJI KOTAD

  2. 2.KAPILBHAI LAXMANBHAI KOTED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted both accused (Motilal Badaji Kothed and Kapilbhai Lakshman Bhai Kothed) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(A), 116(B), and 81, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth Rs. 14,600 during a checkpoint operation on October 19, 2021. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of proper seal verification on seized bottles and absence of credible corroborating physical evidence, which prevented establishment of a conviction-worthy case based solely on police testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 25-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 21-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 06-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 20-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 12-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 26-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 24-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 29-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 02-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 01-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 19-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 19-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 13-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 20-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 07-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 694/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted both accused (Motilal Badaji Kothed and Kapilbhai Lakshman Bhai Kothed) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(A), 116(B), and 81, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite seizure of foreign liquor bottles worth Rs. 14,600 during a checkpoint operation on October 19, 2021. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including lack of proper seal verification on seized bottles and absence of credible corroborating physical evidence, which prevented establishment of a conviction-worthy case based solely on police testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case