GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHCHANDRA BHAVANJI LAKHAJI REBARI Advocate - D K RATHOD — 690/2023

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040007122023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

690/2023

Filing Date

07-02-2023

Registration No

690/2023

Registration Date

07-02-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188007220187

Police Station

MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AE,81

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHCHANDRA BHAVANJI LAKHAJI REBARI Advocate - D K RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

03-04-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

29-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

01-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Meghraj acquitted the accused, Prakashchandra s/o Bhavnaji Lakaji Rebari, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A.I.), 81 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical evidence (sealed bottles with company verification and proper documentation) was not produced on record. Key Reasoning: While 163 bottles of foreign liquor and a vehicle were seized, the court noted the prosecution could not establish the brand authenticity or provide official company confirmation of the liquor seized. The panchayat witnesses' testimony was unreliable due to contradictions, and the panchnama lacked proper sealing procedures required under the Prohibition Act. The court emphasized that conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony without corroborating material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Meghraj acquitted the accused, Prakashchandra s/o Bhavnaji Lakaji Rebari, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A.I.), 81 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical evidence (sealed bottles with company verification and proper documentation) was not produced on record. Key Reasoning: While 163 bottles of foreign liquor and a vehicle were seized, the court noted the prosecution could not establish the brand authenticity or provide official company confirmation of the liquor seized. The panchayat witnesses' testimony was unreliable due to contradictions, and the panchnama lacked proper sealing procedures required under the Prohibition Act. The court emphasized that conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony without corroborating material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case