BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK - MEGHRAJ, MANAGER - PATEL JITENDRA HIRALAL vs KANABHAI PRATAPBHAI DAMOR Advocate - S N UPADHYAY — 582/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 18th May 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040006762022

Filing Number

582/2022

Filing Date

13-Jun-2022

Registration No

582/2022

Registration Date

13-Jun-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK - MEGHRAJ, MANAGER - PATEL JITENDRA HIRALAL

    Adv. B R PANCHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANABHAI PRATAPBHAI DAMOR Advocate - S N UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank filed a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint against Kanabhai Pratapbhai Damor for dishonoring cheque No. 740611 (₹1,89,900) dated February 1, 2022. After the complainant filed his affidavit and underwent partial cross-examination, he repeatedly failed to appear on three consecutive hearing dates (February 25, March 13, and April 29, 2026) for further cross-examination despite multiple adjournments being granted. The court rejected the final adjournment application, excluded the complainant's untested partial statement as inadmissible evidence, and finding no remaining admissible evidence to implicate the accused, dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused under Section 256 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 13-May-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 09-May-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 08-May-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 02-Apr-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 01-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 14-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 20-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 09-Mar-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 05-Mar-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 21-Feb-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 13-Dec-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 18-Oct-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 05-Sep-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 23-Aug-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 09-Jun-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 28-Apr-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 06-Apr-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 04-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 09-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 18-Oct-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 01-Sep-2022

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 16-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 13-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 582/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Baroda Gujarat Gramin Bank filed a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint against Kanabhai Pratapbhai Damor for dishonoring cheque No. 740611 (₹1,89,900) dated February 1, 2022. After the complainant filed his affidavit and underwent partial cross-examination, he repeatedly failed to appear on three consecutive hearing dates (February 25, March 13, and April 29, 2026) for further cross-examination despite multiple adjournments being granted. The court rejected the final adjournment application, excluded the complainant's untested partial statement as inadmissible evidence, and finding no remaining admissible evidence to implicate the accused, dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused under Section 256 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case