GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs INDUBEN KANABHAI HEMABHAI DEDUN — 377/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040004422026

Filing Number

377/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

377/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188007260107

Police Station

MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDUBEN KANABHAI HEMABHAI DEDUN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 377/2026 Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted respondent Induben Kanabhai Hemabhai Dedun under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, after she pleaded guilty to the offense. The court considered her economic circumstances (being poor and the sole earner for her family) and her voluntary confession as mitigating factors, sentencing her to a fine of ₹300 with three days simple imprisonment in default of payment, along with a six-month bond under Section 481 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 377/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 377/2026 Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted respondent Induben Kanabhai Hemabhai Dedun under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, after she pleaded guilty to the offense. The court considered her economic circumstances (being poor and the sole earner for her family) and her voluntary confession as mitigating factors, sentencing her to a fine of ₹300 with three days simple imprisonment in default of payment, along with a six-month bond under Section 481 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case