GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHANABHAI VAGHABHAI DAMOR — 368/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040004332026

Filing Number

368/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

368/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188007260051

Police Station

MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANABHAI VAGHABHAI DAMOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 368/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Shanabhai Vaghabhai Damor The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, based on his voluntary confession and admission of guilt. The respondent, a first-time offender and sole earning member of his poor family, pleaded for leniency; however, the court found his confession to be entirely voluntary with no grounds to consider it otherwise. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with imprisonment of three days in default, considering the circumstances and applicable sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 368/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 368/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Shanabhai Vaghabhai Damor The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, based on his voluntary confession and admission of guilt. The respondent, a first-time offender and sole earning member of his poor family, pleaded for leniency; however, the court found his confession to be entirely voluntary with no grounds to consider it otherwise. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with imprisonment of three days in default, considering the circumstances and applicable sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case