GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHANABHAI VAGHABHAI DAMOR — 368/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040004332026

Case disposed

Filing Number

368/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

368/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11188007260051

Police Station

MEGHRAJ POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66AA

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHANABHAI VAGHABHAI DAMOR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Case 368/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Shanabhai Vaghabhai Damor The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, based on his voluntary confession and admission of guilt. The respondent, a first-time offender and sole earning member of his poor family, pleaded for leniency; however, the court found his confession to be entirely voluntary with no grounds to consider it otherwise. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with imprisonment of three days in default, considering the circumstances and applicable sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 368/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Shanabhai Vaghabhai Damor The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, based on his voluntary confession and admission of guilt. The respondent, a first-time offender and sole earning member of his poor family, pleaded for leniency; however, the court found his confession to be entirely voluntary with no grounds to consider it otherwise. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with imprisonment of three days in default, considering the circumstances and applicable sentencing guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case