GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ASHISHKUMAR VISHRAMBHAI PANDOR Advocate - V R BHOI — 12/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR040000122026

Filing Number

12/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEGHRAJ

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

ISRI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),54
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Section 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHISHKUMAR VISHRAMBHAI PANDOR Advocate - V R BHOI

  2. 2.VISHRAMBHAI MARTABHAI PANDOR

  3. 3.SHARDABEN W/O VISHRAMBHAI MARTABHAI PANDOR

  4. 4.HANSABEN D/O VISHRAMBHAI MARTABHAI W/O ARAVINDBHAI BARANDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 12/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Ashishkumar Vishrambhai Pandor, Vishrambhai Martabhai Pandor, Shardaben, and Hansaben) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), and the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 3, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony alone, without corroborating evidence from other witnesses or documentary proof, was insufficient to establish the alleged harassment, dowry demands, threats, and physical/mental cruelty. The court noted critical gaps in the prosecution's case and found the complainant's account lacked material corroboration necessary to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 12/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Ashishkumar Vishrambhai Pandor, Vishrambhai Martabhai Pandor, Shardaben, and Hansaben) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), and the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 3, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony alone, without corroborating evidence from other witnesses or documentary proof, was insufficient to establish the alleged harassment, dowry demands, threats, and physical/mental cruelty. The court noted critical gaps in the prosecution's case and found the complainant's account lacked material corroboration necessary to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case