MAKARANI FIROZKHAN MUNIRKHAN vs MANASURI JANUBHAI PIRABHAI — 1329/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR030017472025

Filing Number

1329/2025

Filing Date

30-Aug-2025

Registration No

1329/2025

Registration Date

30-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAKARANI FIROZKHAN MUNIRKHAN

    Adv. B M RABARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANASURI JANUBHAI PIRABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Bhiloda Additional Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking to pursue the case further under Section 16 of a procedural statute. The court found that continuing the original case was not permissible and instead directed filing of a fresh case in the competent forum based on proper jurisdiction grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1329/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bhiloda Additional Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking to pursue the case further under Section 16 of a procedural statute. The court found that continuing the original case was not permissible and instead directed filing of a fresh case in the competent forum based on proper jurisdiction grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case