KALASVA REKHABEN KAMJIBHAI vs BARANDA SHRIKANTBHAI HIMATBHAI Advocate - V S PARMAR — 237/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,22,23,31. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAR030014942024

Filing Number

237/2024

Filing Date

11-Sep-2024

Registration No

237/2024

Registration Date

11-Sep-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,22,23,31

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALASVA REKHABEN KAMJIBHAI

    Adv. B S KOTWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BARANDA SHRIKANTBHAI HIMATBHAI Advocate - V S PARMAR

  2. 2.BARANDA HIMATBHAI BECHARBHAI

  3. 3.BARANDA KANUBEN W/O HIIMATBHAI BECHARBHAI

  4. 4.BARANDA KIRANBHAI HIMATBHAI

  5. 5.BARANDA SAGUNABEN HIMATBHAI

  6. 6.BARANDA SURAJBHAI HIMATBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 237/2024 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioner's (Kalasva Rekhaben) petition for domestic violence relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that respondent number 1 (husband Shrikantbhai) inflicted physical and mental cruelty on the petitioner through repeated beatings, taunts about childlessness, and threats of remarriage. The court ordered respondent number 1 to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000 for expenses, provide separate housing, and pay Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation for the abuse suffered, while restraining respondents from entering the petitioner's residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 17-May-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 18-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 21-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 16-Nov-2024

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 05-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 11-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 237/2024 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioner's (Kalasva Rekhaben) petition for domestic violence relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that respondent number 1 (husband Shrikantbhai) inflicted physical and mental cruelty on the petitioner through repeated beatings, taunts about childlessness, and threats of remarriage. The court ordered respondent number 1 to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000 for expenses, provide separate housing, and pay Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation for the abuse suffered, while restraining respondents from entering the petitioner's residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case