Government of Gujarat vs RAHULBHAI NAGAJIBHAI KATARA — 478/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR030006342026

Filing Number

478/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

478/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

071

Police Station

SHAMLAJI POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHULBHAI NAGAJIBHAI KATARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 478-2026 The court convicted the accused Rahulbhai Nagajibhai Katara under IPC Section 271 (disobedience of quarantine/health order) for violating COVID-19 containment guidelines. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense after being informed of police evidence, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹250 (or five days simple imprisonment in default), considering the established legal principles for such violations. The seized materials were ordered to be destroyed as part of the final judgment delivered on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 478/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 478-2026 The court convicted the accused Rahulbhai Nagajibhai Katara under IPC Section 271 (disobedience of quarantine/health order) for violating COVID-19 containment guidelines. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense after being informed of police evidence, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹250 (or five days simple imprisonment in default), considering the established legal principles for such violations. The seized materials were ordered to be destroyed as part of the final judgment delivered on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case