Government of Gujarat vs RAGHJIBHAI MANUBHAI THAVARAJI KALASAVA — 428/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR030005762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

428/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

428/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

172

Police Station

BHILODA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 285,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAGHJIBHAI MANUBHAI THAVARAJI KALASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Bhiloda convicted the accused under IPC Sections 275 and 285 (related to negligence causing danger) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹250 or five days simple imprisonment, with an additional fine of ₹5 imposed. The court found the accused guilty of voluntary admission to the charges after reviewing police documents and established that a light sentence was appropriate considering the nature of the offense, the accused's circumstances, and relevant legal precedents set by the Gujarat High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Bhiloda convicted the accused under IPC Sections 275 and 285 (related to negligence causing danger) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹250 or five days simple imprisonment, with an additional fine of ₹5 imposed. The court found the accused guilty of voluntary admission to the charges after reviewing police documents and established that a light sentence was appropriate considering the nature of the offense, the accused's circumstances, and relevant legal precedents set by the Gujarat High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case