Government of Gujarat vs NARENDRABHAI MAHESHBHAI NARASINHBHAI CHENAVA — 422/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR030005702026

Filing Number

422/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

422/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

962

Police Station

BHILODA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85(1),66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRABHAI MAHESHBHAI NARASINHBHAI CHENAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC sections 447(1)(b) and 85(1) for criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation by threat, finding the accused guilty of voluntarily confessing to the charges. The court sentenced the accused to simple imprisonment for the period already undergone and imposed a fine of ₹100, with an additional three days' simple imprisonment in case of default in payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 422/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC sections 447(1)(b) and 85(1) for criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation by threat, finding the accused guilty of voluntarily confessing to the charges. The court sentenced the accused to simple imprisonment for the period already undergone and imposed a fine of ₹100, with an additional three days' simple imprisonment in case of default in payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case