Government of Gujarat vs BACHUBHAI DHULABHAI BHARADA — 421/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR030005692026

Filing Number

421/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

421/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

097

Police Station

SHAMLAJI POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BACHUBHAI DHULABHAI BHARADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 271 for violating prohibitory orders and sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with 6 days simple imprisonment as an alternative in case of non-payment of the fine. The court considered the nature of the offense, sentencing provisions, and relevant judicial precedents before imposing this lenient sentence in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 271 for violating prohibitory orders and sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 100, with 6 days simple imprisonment as an alternative in case of non-payment of the fine. The court considered the nature of the offense, sentencing provisions, and relevant judicial precedents before imposing this lenient sentence in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case