Government of Gujarat vs DHANJIBHAI DITABHAI AAMBALIYA — 417/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR030005652026

Filing Number

417/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

417/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHILODA

Judge

5-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

BHILODA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHANJIBHAI DITABHAI AAMBALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 271 for filing false/fraudulent claims and sentenced him to imprisonment for 5 days or a fine of Rs. 250, with an alternative sentence of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court found the accused guilty of voluntarily confessing to the crime before the magistrate with an undertaking not to commit similar offenses in future, and applied sentencing guidelines while considering the nature of the offense and the accused's circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 271 for filing false/fraudulent claims and sentenced him to imprisonment for 5 days or a fine of Rs. 250, with an alternative sentence of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court found the accused guilty of voluntarily confessing to the crime before the magistrate with an undertaking not to commit similar offenses in future, and applied sentencing guidelines while considering the nature of the offense and the accused's circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case