Government of Gujarat vs NEMABHAI NATHABHAI BHARADA Advocate - B S KOTWAL — 209/2023
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116B,98(2),81,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR030002232023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
209/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
209/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHILODA
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
357
Police Station
BHILODA POLICE STATION – ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NEMABHAI NATHABHAI BHARADA Advocate - B S KOTWAL
DASHRATH CHANDULAL GAMETI
Adv. B S KOTWAL
NAVINBHAI HANSAJI BHAT
Adv. S J ASARI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a clear case against them. The court held that the evidence was incomplete and circumstantial, noting that crucial procedural requirements—such as proper witness testimony and documentation regarding the seized alcohol bottles—were not satisfied, making it impossible to presume guilt or connect the accused to the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a clear case against them. The court held that the evidence was incomplete and circumstantial, noting that crucial procedural requirements—such as proper witness testimony and documentation regarding the seized alcohol bottles—were not satisfied, making it impossible to presume guilt or connect the accused to the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts