Government of Gujarat vs RAVINDRSINH S/O GATUSINH CHUHAN Advocate - I A RATHOD — 86/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),81,83. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR030000972025
Filing Number
86/2025
Filing Date
08-Jan-2025
Registration No
86/2025
Registration Date
08-Jan-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHILODA
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
456
Police Station
SHAMLAJI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVINDRSINH S/O GATUSINH CHUHAN Advocate - I A RATHOD
-
2.KALIYANSINH S/O MOHABATSINH CHUHAN
-
3.JAGADISH S/O VALAJIBHAI YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 86/2025 The court acquitted all three accused (Ravindrsinh, Kaliyansinh, and Jagadish) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for transporting foreign liquor brands in an allegedly unauthorized manner. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies lacked independent corroboration, crucial investigation procedures were incomplete, and the seized bottles lacked proper manufacturer documentation required to raise legal presumptions. The court ruled the evidence was insufficient, unclear, and lacking proper independent witness support to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 86/2025
Summary of Case 86/2025 The court acquitted all three accused (Ravindrsinh, Kaliyansinh, and Jagadish) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for transporting foreign liquor brands in an allegedly unauthorized manner. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies lacked independent corroboration, crucial investigation procedures were incomplete, and the seized bottles lacked proper manufacturer documentation required to raise legal presumptions. The court ruled the evidence was insufficient, unclear, and lacking proper independent witness support to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts