INSPECTING OFFICER (COURT FEES) vs SUTHAR MOHMMAD HASIF GULAMHUSAIN — 5/2025

Case under Gujarat Court-fees Act, 2004 Section 12(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CFR - COURT FEES REFERENCE

CNR: GJAR020055712025

Filing Number

5/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

30-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Court-fees Act, 2004 Section 12(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTING OFFICER (COURT FEES)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUTHAR MOHMMAD HASIF GULAMHUSAIN

  2. 2.BAKAROLIYA FAKIRAMOHAMAND IQBALBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the reference filed by the Inspecting Officer (Court Fees) regarding court fee deficiency of Rs. 1,500 in a case. The court found that the original court fee paid was adequate, and the demand for additional court fee was without merit, rendering the reference case number 05/2025 dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the reference filed by the Inspecting Officer (Court Fees) regarding court fee deficiency of Rs. 1,500 in a case. The court found that the original court fee paid was adequate, and the demand for additional court fee was without merit, rendering the reference case number 05/2025 dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case