Government of Gujarat vs KUNDANBHAI SHANKARBHAI TABIYAD — 2449/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAR020038012024
Filing Number
2445/2024
Filing Date
04-10-2024
Registration No
2449/2024
Registration Date
04-10-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT, MODASA
Judge
7-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
TINTOI POLICE STATION - ARVALLI @ MODASA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KUNDANBHAI SHANKARBHAI TABIYAD
Hearing History
Judge: 7-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary This Modasa Additional Sessions Court judgment acquits the accused Kundan Bhai Shankar Bhai Taliyad of theft charges (IPC Sections 379, 114) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt regarding the alleged theft of a motorcycle and other items, as key witnesses could not positively identify the perpetrators and circumstantial evidence was inconclusive. The accused is ordered to be released and furnished an acquittal certificate under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This Modasa Additional Sessions Court judgment acquits the accused Kundan Bhai Shankar Bhai Taliyad of theft charges (IPC Sections 379, 114) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt regarding the alleged theft of a motorcycle and other items, as key witnesses could not positively identify the perpetrators and circumstantial evidence was inconclusive. The accused is ordered to be released and furnished an acquittal certificate under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts