HARSIDHHI PETROLIYAM vs GIRIRAJ PETROLIUM Advocate - V R KOTHARI — 2319/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAR020033002025

Filing Number

2319/2025

Filing Date

12-Aug-2025

Registration No

2319/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARSIDHHI PETROLIYAM

    Adv. V N SONI

  2. 2.RAVAL PRATHIT RUSHIKESHBHAI

  3. 3.RAVAL SONALNEN RUSHIKESHBHAI

  4. 4.RAVAL HARSHITKUMAR RUSHIKESHBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRIRAJ PETROLIUM Advocate - V R KOTHARI

  2. 2.PARAGBHAI PRAMODBHAI SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused after both the complainant and accused reached a mutual settlement and agreed not to pursue the case further. The court filed the case and dismissed the charges against the accused, as Section 08 of the relevant act permitted withdrawal of cases based on mutual compromise between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2319/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused after both the complainant and accused reached a mutual settlement and agreed not to pursue the case further. The court filed the case and dismissed the charges against the accused, as Section 08 of the relevant act permitted withdrawal of cases based on mutual compromise between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case