PRKASHCHANDRA LALCHANDBHAI SHAH vs HITESH AMRUTLALA SONI Advocate - B.M.KOTHARI — 14/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAR020019062018
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
14/2018
Filing Date
03-10-2018
Registration No
14/2018
Registration Date
03-10-2018
Court
CIVIL COURT, MODASA
Judge
3-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRKASHCHANDRA LALCHANDBHAI SHAH
Adv. S.R.PANDYA
Respondent(s)
HITESH AMRUTLALA SONI Advocate - B.M.KOTHARI
CITY SARVE SUPRITENDANT SHRI,
Adv. AGP
MAMLATDAR SHRI
Adv. AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 25-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a Special Civil Suit judgment from Gujarat High Court (dated December 23, 2020) regarding a money recovery case. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,15,20,021 against the defendants, holding that the statute of limitations had expired and proper legal procedures were not followed. The court found that while defendants owed the amount, the claim could not be entertained due to procedural defects and the time-barred nature of the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a Special Civil Suit judgment from Gujarat High Court (dated December 23, 2020) regarding a money recovery case. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,15,20,021 against the defendants, holding that the statute of limitations had expired and proper legal procedures were not followed. The court found that while defendants owed the amount, the claim could not be entertained due to procedural defects and the time-barred nature of the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts