DCB BANK LTD. ( SATISH TRAPASIYA ) vs VANJARA HIRABHAI KARMABHAI — 129/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJAR020007052026

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MODASA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DCB BANK LTD. ( SATISH TRAPASIYA )

    Adv. J V BAROT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VANJARA HIRABHAI KARMABHAI

  2. 2.VANJARA BHAVANABEN HIRABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Modasa Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. 103, Dwarkapuri Township, Modasa) valued at approximately Rs. 22.72 lakhs on behalf of DCB Bank Ltd. against borrowers Vanjara Hirabhai and Vanjara Bhavanaben, who defaulted on their loan repayment obligations under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Modasa Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. 103, Dwarkapuri Township, Modasa) valued at approximately Rs. 22.72 lakhs on behalf of DCB Bank Ltd. against borrowers Vanjara Hirabhai and Vanjara Bhavanaben, who defaulted on their loan repayment obligations under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case