IMRANHUSAIN ABDULMAJID KANKROLIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 67/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJAR020003602026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MODASA

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

1.IMRANHUSAIN ABDULMAJID KANKROLIYA

Adv. D R BHARVAD

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
2.STATE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Modasa allowed the applicant Mr. Imranhussain Abdualmajid Kakrolia's application under Section 503 of the BNS to recover ₹3,00,000 frozen in an ICICI Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court ordered the bank to defreeze and release the amount to the applicant's SBI account upon furnishing a surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, with conditions that the applicant produce the amount when ordered and return it if any other claimant proves legal interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
07-Mar-2026

Order

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
03-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
03-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Modasa allowed the applicant Mr. Imranhussain Abdualmajid Kakrolia's application under Section 503 of the BNS to recover ₹3,00,000 frozen in an ICICI Bank account following a cyber fraud complaint. The court ordered the bank to defreeze and release the amount to the applicant's SBI account upon furnishing a surety and personal bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, with conditions that the applicant produce the amount when ordered and return it if any other claimant proves legal interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.