JADEJA GAJENDRASINH VIKRAMSINH vs CYBER CRIME PI SHRI MODASA — 54/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJAR020003142026
Filing Number
54/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, MODASA
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JADEJA GAJENDRASINH VIKRAMSINH
Adv. B P PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.CYBER CRIME PI SHRI MODASA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Modasa allowed the application of Mr. Jadeja Gajendrasinh Vikramsinh under Section 503 BNS to release frozen bank amounts (totaling approximately Rs. 26,900) that were seized in a cyber fraud case. The court ordered the banks to defreeze and release the amounts to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing a surety bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, with the condition that the applicant must produce the amount before the court if ordered and return it if any other person proves a valid claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2026
The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Modasa allowed the application of Mr. Jadeja Gajendrasinh Vikramsinh under Section 503 BNS to release frozen bank amounts (totaling approximately Rs. 26,900) that were seized in a cyber fraud case. The court ordered the banks to defreeze and release the amounts to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing a surety bond of 1.5 times the seized amount, with the condition that the applicant must produce the amount before the court if ordered and return it if any other person proves a valid claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts