LALITABEN PRAVINBHAI PATEL vs TALATI CUM MANTRI SHRI, THE SAYARA GRUP GRAM PANCHAYAT, — 3/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAR020002592022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
3/2022
Filing Date
01-02-2022
Registration No
3/2022
Registration Date
01-02-2022
Court
CIVIL COURT, MODASA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALITABEN PRAVINBHAI PATEL
Adv. B.R.PATEL
PRAVINBHAI MULCHANDBHAI PATEL
Adv. B.R.PATEL
JAYENDRABHAI MULCHANDBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir)
Adv. B.R.PATEL3.
JASHODABEN JAYENDRABHAI PATEL
Adv. B.R.PATEL3.
RINKALBEN JYENDRABHAI PATEL
Adv. B.R.PATEL3.
PINKALBEN JAYENDRABHAI PATEL
Adv. B.R.PATEL3.
AMITKUMAR JAYENDRABHAI PATEL
Adv. B.R.PATEL
Respondent(s)
TALATI CUM MANTRI SHRI, THE SAYARA GRUP GRAM PANCHAYAT,
SUB REGISTRAR SHREE
Adv. DGP
YOGI DHARMENDRAKUMAR CHANDULAL
PRAVINBHAI ISHVARBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The petition filed under the Specific Relief Act was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the required grounds for relief, including: (1) that this was their first actionable case; (2) that they would suffer irreparable loss if monetary compensation were unavailable; and (3) that equity favored their claim. The court also noted deficiencies in the pleading and drafting of the petition, ruling that specific relief petitions require clear and specific pleading as per Supreme Court precedent. The order was dated 27/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The petition filed under the Specific Relief Act was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the required grounds for relief, including: (1) that this was their first actionable case; (2) that they would suffer irreparable loss if monetary compensation were unavailable; and (3) that equity favored their claim. The court also noted deficiencies in the pleading and drafting of the petition, ruling that specific relief petitions require clear and specific pleading as per Supreme Court precedent. The order was dated 27/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts