KAPILABEN JAYESHBHAI TARAR vs TARAR JAYESHBHAI REVABHAI Advocate - B J PATEL — 38/2026

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,19(8),20,22. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJAR020002072026

Filing Number

38/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

38/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, MODASA

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,19(8),20,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAPILABEN JAYESHBHAI TARAR

    Adv. K S RABARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARAR JAYESHBHAI REVABHAI Advocate - B J PATEL

  2. 2.REVABHAI MOHANBHAI TARAR

    Adv. B J PATEL

  3. 3.PREMILABEN REVABHAI TARAR

    Adv. B J PATEL

  4. 4.GOPIBEN REVABHAI TARAR

    Adv. B J PATEL

  5. 5.CHINKIBEN REVABHAI TARAR

    Adv. B J PATEL

  6. 6.HIRALBEN REVABHAI TARAR

    Adv. B J PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the appeal filed under Article 15 of the Constitution against an earlier decision, finding that the respondent's appointment was improper and violated procedures. The judgment, dated 01.04.2025, directs the cancellation of the appointment and orders acquittal of the witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the appeal filed under Article 15 of the Constitution against an earlier decision, finding that the respondent's appointment was improper and violated procedures. The judgment, dated 01.04.2025, directs the cancellation of the appointment and orders acquittal of the witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case