RAMILABEN MAHENDRABHAI BHARVAD vs BACHUBHAI SHIBHABHAI BHARVAD Advocate - R A DESAI — 1170/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAR010027812025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1170/2025

Filing Date

12-11-2025

Registration No

1170/2025

Registration Date

12-11-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

4-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

LIMITATION ACT, 1963 Section 5
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

RAMILABEN MAHENDRABHAI BHARVAD

Adv. J S BHARVAD

Respondent(s)

BACHUBHAI SHIBHABHAI BHARVAD Advocate - R A DESAI

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. J D PANCHAL

Hearing History

Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

18-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Arvalli granted Ramilaben Mahendrabhai Bharvad's application to condone a 2-day delay in filing an appeal against a trial court order dated 10.10.2025. The applicant's delay was caused by being out of station, and the respondent raised no objection. The court prioritized substantial justice over technical grounds, holding that cases should be decided on merits rather than procedural technicalities, and directed the registry to register the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Arvalli granted Ramilaben Mahendrabhai Bharvad's application to condone a 2-day delay in filing an appeal against a trial court order dated 10.10.2025. The applicant's delay was caused by being out of station, and the respondent raised no objection. The court prioritized substantial justice over technical grounds, holding that cases should be decided on merits rather than procedural technicalities, and directed the registry to register the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case