KULDIPBHAI MAHENDRABHAI BHARVAD vs BACHUBHAI SHIBHABHAI BHARVAD Advocate - R A DESAI — 1169/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAR010027802025
Filing Number
1169/2025
Filing Date
12-Nov-2025
Registration No
1169/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, MODASA
Judge
4-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULDIPBHAI MAHENDRABHAI BHARVAD
Adv. J S BHARVAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.BACHUBHAI SHIBHABHAI BHARVAD Advocate - R A DESAI
-
2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. J D PANCHAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court allowed Kuldipbhai Mahendrabhai Bharvad's application to condone a 2-day delay in filing an appeal against a trial court judgment dated 10.10.2025, citing his father's illness as the reason for the delay. The court emphasized that substantial justice should prevail over technical grounds and that cases should be decided on merits; the opponent's advocate also filed no objection to condonation, supporting the decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1169/2025
The court allowed Kuldipbhai Mahendrabhai Bharvad's application to condone a 2-day delay in filing an appeal against a trial court judgment dated 10.10.2025, citing his father's illness as the reason for the delay. The court emphasized that substantial justice should prevail over technical grounds and that cases should be decided on merits; the opponent's advocate also filed no objection to condonation, supporting the decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts