MAHAMAD UMAR IMAMUDDIN MISTRI vs PRAKASHBHAI LALCHAND SHAH Advocate - S R PANDYA — 408/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJAR010026912025

Filing Number

408/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

408/2025

Registration Date

03-Nov-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, MODASA

Judge

4-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHAMAD UMAR IMAMUDDIN MISTRI

    Adv. R B VANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI LALCHAND SHAH Advocate - S R PANDYA

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. J D PANCHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The appellate court allowed Mahamad Umar Imamuddin Mistri's appeal and quashed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, following an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court acquitted the appellant of all charges and ordered any deposited amounts be returned to the complainant via cheque. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The appellate court allowed Mahamad Umar Imamuddin Mistri's appeal and quashed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, following an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The court acquitted the appellant of all charges and ordered any deposited amounts be returned to the complainant via cheque. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case